Learning Styles
Learning styles... I didn't meet this concept until my kids were in their teens so applied common sense only to my children. I learned when they were toddlers that I couldn't parent them the same way. Each child was different! What a surprise. I couldn't discipline Roger the same way as April, so all my research and knowledge on that subject went onto the top shelf and I started again. Thomas presented yet another version of child - eeek! What worked on Roger didn't work on him. I found myself using different parenting, teaching, disciplining... styles with each child. I guess you could say I learned about learning styles in a very natural fashion!
Somewhere along the way I had a sane moment and figured that if I worked out how best *I* learn I might get a handle on what to do with these three kids. I thought about all the things that make me tick - what I like, don't like, what turns me on, keeps me going, how I do things, both 'good' and 'bad', the distractions I'm addicted to, etc. I discovered that Robin -dear husband - didn't think like me... This was after a decade of marriage. Suddenly the problems in our marriage made sense. I fully expected that his brain was wired the same way as mine and couldn't understand why he couldn't analyse literature, or predict what people were going to do next, or do three things at once and still have a conversation with me! He suddenly realised why the kids stopped paying attention when he took on the role of teacher and preached his knowledge at them, expecting them to instantly learn... :-)
Without knowing that Howard Gardiner, Thomas Armstrong or Alan Thomas existed, I worked out that if I treated my children as PEOPLE, rather than children, and thought of us all as LEARNERS, then homeschooling became a lot easier. It had to do with respect, rather than doing or knowing anything in particular. By watching how my very different three learners learned, and by observing how *I* learned, it became apparent that we were all using very similar techniques, regardless of age. From there I noticed that I had definite preferences for particular methods. I like to read and think. I need to write. I have to make meaning that is personal. I don't retail details. I'm a big picture person. I test hypothesises. Learning styles - the things the above guys write about - is about preferences. Underneath the preferences we all learn in much the same way. As we grow we hone our preferences - usually at the expense of an all-round holistic education. Me, I gave up my musical ability to focus on my passion for writing stories instead of lyrics to songs. Every so often a few lines of a song will burst from me, original words and tune, and I wonder if, had I lived differently as tot, might I have become a Kylie Minogue? The 'left-brained' scientist and writer dominated and I'm happy.
Below is how I learn, and it's how I see most people, including my children learn. I accomodated my children's learning preferences/styles, once I recognised that they weren't little duplicates of me, where I could, and I probably could have done a much better job. It's about providing the most suitable resources and opportunities, but also about keeping education holistically balanced and continuously providing opportunity to exercise the whole body, mind and spirit, not just what we're naturally talented at or interested in... Howard Gardner's multiple intelligences - http://www.pz.harvard.edu/PIs/HG.htmis - are great way to get a handle on understanding the whole person. There is more great information at www.thomasarmstrong.com/multiple_intelligences.htm.
How I learn:
First I fully believe that "I live, therefore I learn!" I can't avoid learning - it's as natural as breathing (John Holt). As an asthmatic I know that, just as breathing can be laboured and hard work, so can learning...
When I look at how I learn best I can see the following processes happening:
I become immersed in whatever it is that I am interested in learning. I find out as much as I can about my task or interest - it becomes almost obsessive, until my appetite for information or quest for skills has abated. I become totally focussed and involved. It doesn't matter if I am learning to tie a shoe lace or rebuild a combustion engine, the concentration that follows my intense interest drives the learning process. This is immersion. This is natural learning.
I recognise that as an individual I would learn very little on my own and left to my own devices. Humans are social creatures - we learn by watching and by listening to others. Sometimes this is called imitation, or another, less favoured word is copying. But more importantly I observe the demonstrations that take place everyday of those skills and actions I need or want to emulate. The higher my interest or passion the closer I observe and learn. If I wanted to learn to play piano I would seek out the company of other pianists and watch, listen and learn, copy their playing techniques, ask them to demonstrate their skill for me. Observation and demonstration are key aspects to natural learning.
But learning doesn't flow from simply observing others demonstrating skills, or listening to the knowledge and wisdom of others. Learning involves engagement, actively doing whatever it is I need to do in order to learn. The best learning occurs when my interest is focussed and I am using my whole body. I am an active learner. A person that 'does' as well as 'think'. I actively construct my experiences, in a social context.
No one learns in a social vacuum. Whether the expectation to learn and succeed comes from within ourselves or from others this expectation is a necessary aspect of learning. A high level of expectation of success is a prerequisite to success. Natural learners trust in the innate ability of children and adults to learn. This trust is grounded on a firm foundation of acute observation of past experience. Most importantly, as a learner, I feel supported by this trust and faith in my ability to be a successful learner by important people in my life.
I understand the responsibility for learning rests completely with me, the learner. To engage in meaningful and successful learning I may engage the services of a teacher, but the teacher can't coerce or force me to learn if I am not interested or motivated to learn at that particular moment. I can remember many times learning 'parrot fashion' or memorising lessons in school that had no meaning for me. I scarcely remember the content of those lessons at all, and realise that much of what I learned at school was because I had to, rather than wanted to. I rarely understood why I needed to learn at all everything put before me, and most of it has either left me completely or has never been of any practical use in my adult life.
When I think back to my most successful learning experiences as a child I can see that I was fully engaged, interested and passionate. I now recognise that these were also the times that I carried the responsibility for my own learning, times I was allowed to be fully responsible for the learning occurring.
Of course, it is important to use and practice new learning or it quickly fades. This isn't the same as rote memorising or doing pages and pages of drill exercises... for the natural learner using the new skill or knowledge in a meaningful context a couple of times is all that is required to firmly cement it into the realms of experience, ready to be recalled and used at any time in the future. We tend to forget those things that are not of use, or interest or learned without full engagement of our minds and bodies.
As a learner I often make mistakes - make guesses, approximations, have a go, try things out. This is another essential aspect of the learning process. Everyone makes approximations in the learning process - there is nothing inherently wrong with it. Some people value the ability to make approximations highly, seeing it as creative or lateral thinking! Viewing 'mistakes' as positive learning experiences opens up many doors, inviting learners on journeys of discovery... The wisest piece of advice on learning that I've ever heard was to value the process of asking questions over that of discovering answers. The question is the key to discovery, and the question can never be wrong!
All of us need feedback, some kind of response to our learning journeys. I know I do. Natural learners don't thrive on reward or punishment - stickers, certificates or detention - no one does. Natural learners thrive on meaningful and positive feedback. Critical evaluation needs to be continuous, reflective, constructive, positive and supportive.
Learning is a natural phenomenon. It is like breathing. When it stops, you're dead! It occurs in the home learning environment regardless of educational philosophy and methodologies adopted. Taking advantage of this type of learning offers a superior education seldom found in educational institutions.
Beverley
www.alwayslearningbooks.com.au
http://homeschoolaustralia.beverleypaine.com


